![]() |
Family Law Section |
||||||
|
|
|
Minutes August 13, 2002 |
| FAMILY LAW
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING Tuesday, August 13, 2002 In Attendance:
Excused: 1. Minutes. Approval of the minutes for April and May was tabled until the next meeting. 2. Budget/Section Finances. The Section account balance is $1029.30. That does not reflect the new membership fees. 3. Schedule of Executive Committee Meetings. The Tuesday meeting time has been a problem for several people. Marci moved that we change the meeting day to the second Wednesday of the month beginning in January. Lori seconded the motion. It passed unanimously. That will allow the Commissioners and Judges to be able to adjust their future calendars to enable them to attend. Stewart will contact the Bar and reserve the room and arrange the food. 4. Appointment of Section Representative for Online Court Assistance Project. We need to replace Rex Olsen who had served as our representative. The purpose is to update the Online Court forms. Louise Knauer volunteered and was unanimously approved. 5. Dialogue on Freedom. The vote regarding financial support to the program was 7 opposed and 4 in favor. The reason for the opposition was the concern about the budget. The program matches attorneys with a member of executive and the legislature to go into every high school government or civics class. There is a specific topic that will be discussed. The discussions will take place during the week of September 11. More volunteers are needed. If you wish to volunteer, you are encouraged to contact the Utah State Bar office. 6. Committees.
9. Young Lawyers. The Young Lawyers had arranged for an expert to come in to do a CLE on DNA in paternity matters. They asked the section to help pay for the seminar. Karma indicated that she had a real problem with that because she could arrange a speaker for no cost. Stewart was going to get more specifics and get back to the Executive Committee by e-mail. 10. Third District Court letter. Judge Nehring has apparently received the letter sent from Kellie. Some of the Executive Committee members have had judges comment favorably to the concern. We have not received an official answer from the court, though. It was recommended that we send another letter indicating that we appreciate the fact that he distributed the letter, but we wanted to follow-up to see if there had been a policy determined. The meeting adjourned. |
|
|
|
|
The Utah State Bar presents this web site as a service to our members and to the public. Information presented in this site is NOT legal advice. Please review the Terms of Use for more policy, disclaimer & liability information - ©Utah State Bar email:webmaster@utahbar.org |
|